(07-31-2015, 04:34 PM)Shane Anonistrator Said: Yes I see what you're saying but was that entire message not geared toward questioning the rule and suggesting that perhaps it not exist, or at the very least include a lesser number of restricted items?

Nope not at all. In fact the exact opposite. I was asking if that specific example which was not in anyway addressed previously should also be considered unacceptable not advocating for why it should be acceptable.