Quote:I find it laughable John that you would throw a list down of some people, who I agree, deserve a shot at the crown and that I should give it to them, all the while ignoring the fact that you held the crown for 8 months. I'm curious John but why didn't you give any of them a shot at the crown?

You'll have to ask Paul Heyman and Wallace Witasick. They were the guys who booked my crown matches. I stayed out of it in the interest of fairness. At least when they did give me opponents, it was superstars who actually DESERVED it. Sure, I offered to give Gilmour a freebie at one point, but Paul could have easily told me to go fuck myself. It's not my fault that Paul Heyman (and now Eli James) love my ideas.

Quote:Here's the deal John, and this goes for Peter as well. I'm not giving Peter a shot at the crown, I'm giving him a shot, to earn a shot at the crown.

No one wants to see that shit. Everyone knows Peter will lose! Peter even knows that he'll lose, that's why he only accepts handicap matches. That's why my idea is perfect.

Gilmour and Madison versus Theo Pryce for the King Title.

Everyone wants to see it.

Everyone except for you anyway.

I don't blame you, a lot of guys would be afraid to accept that challenge.

I'm glad that you're willing to admit that accepting the match would be the end of your run as king.

But you go ahead and take the safe route and wrestle Peter Gilmour one on one.