Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

**07-11-2013, 03:50 PM**

Quote:Just a thought but i think sometimes its better to only have a small number of regular judges, that way they know the characters involved, their history, the significance of events etc.

I understand what you're thinking, but really, what someone did a week ago, two weeks ago, or two months ago has no bearing on the judgments. All that matters is what you and everyone else has done this week. For this show.

Quote:Some people dont recap in their rps and could suffer for that with one off judges. You could make the argument that not recapping is a weakness but i think people should be judged on their work not whether it totally makes sense to people unaware of the arc.

Another fair point, but I don't see recapping as a strength or a weakness. Sure, if someone has a long running story (like myself) it is better to update the reader on what's gone down recently, but it's not a must.

Quote:Not saying this for my benefit btw, just came to mind when i was replying to Matt Lennox in the predictions thread. Theres also the danger of people subconsciously placing well known peoples work over new people's that affects judging.

I can snuff that stuff out pretty easily just by certain judges responses as to why so and so should win.

I understand your concern, but at the same time, you should trust that proper winners will be decided upon.

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Important! PPV - Guest Judges
Author	Message